Prediction of Daniil Ostapenkov [898th] vs Jannik Opitz [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W W L
Form
L W W L W L W W W LHead To Head: Ostapenkov 0 - 0 Opitz
| Ostapenkov | Stats | Opitz |
|---|---|---|
| 79% (19-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (4-2) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 898 | Ranking | N/A |
| 840 | Highest Rank | |
| 21 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (102-57) | Career Total W/L | 56% (48-37) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Ostapenkov VS Opitz H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniil Ostapenkov vs Jannik Opitz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ostapenkov 0 - 0 Opitz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ostapenkov has won 39.88% of points on their second serve, while Opitz has won 45.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ostapenkov, in recent form, has won 46.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Opitz has won 46.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.95% and 24.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ostapenkov has saved 48.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Opitz has saved 52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ostapenkov has won 72.34% of matches played (W/L 34/ 13), with Opitz winning 58.82% (W/L 10/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ostapenkov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 84/ 38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16). Opitz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 15/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Ostapenkov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.34% of matches (W/L 34/ 13), where as Opitz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ostapenkov has played against opponents with an average rank of 274.34 while Opitz has played against players with an average rank of 50.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ostapenkov has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Opitz has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ostapenkov has converted 31.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Opitz has converted 14.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Daniil Ostapenkov vs Jannik Opitz Best Odds For The Match
Daniil Ostapenkov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Joris De Loore
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
52 of
68)
15
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Daniil Bogatov
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Leonardo Borrelli
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Yukun Wang
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Federico Bondioli
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Martin Krumich
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Daniil Chizhuk
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jannik Opitz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Jannik Opitz
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Michael Zhu
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
82)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 5-7 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
German Mingaleev
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Jermar
Player
Jannik Opitz
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Brian Bozemoj
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
14
Total Points Won
16
|
3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Jannik Opitz
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Antoine Walch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
16
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Maxime Gouge
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
15
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Jannik Opitz
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ostapenkov vs Opitz?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ostapenkov Vs Opitz is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (102/57) | Win/Loss | 56% (48/37) |
| 64% (218/124) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (107/88) |
| 57% (1716/1290) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1023/942) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 441 | Aces Total | 352 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 292 | Total Double Faults | 178 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 310.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 288.21 |
| 63% (4147/6609) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2260/3740) |
| 68% (2821/4147) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (1661/2260) |
| 47% (1163/2473) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (713/1479) |
| 47% (361/775) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (106/290) |
| 43% (2902/6772) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1280/3601) |
| 65% (100/155) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (48/85) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (8/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (18/31) |
| 43% (12/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (14/25) |
| 92% (106/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (43/38) |
| 8% (106/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (43/5) |
| 8% (53/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (42/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
